Are You Wasting Money on Supplements? It's All About the Branding.
The Importance of Context in Supplement Branding
Let’s talk supplements.
Pardon my College Professor-esque prelude for a minute here (you either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become the villain – I have become the villain) and explain the term “supplement”, which means to supply, add, or reinforce a whole. Naturally, dietary or nutritional supplements, by extension, supplement an individual’s diet. These can come in various forms like pills, capsules, powders, or liquids. I’ve used the word “supplement” (including this instance) five times now (don’t try counting) to reinforce the point I’ll be objectively emphasizing in this article: the extent to which brands truly supplement, relative to their claims. This also addresses the absolute most common problem: that, strangely, the average consumer misreads the word “supplement” as “replacement”.” Let’s get into that. (Whoever tried counting how many supplements at that point, I knew it was seven, including the headings; I just wanted to see how much my audience actually believed in me.)
How many of you have scrolled through your feeds, bombarded by a barrage of Instagram content – slick ads, beaming influencers, aspirational lifestyle shots – each pushing a different “game-changing” supplement? Maybe it’s a powder promising “Max results with clean ingredients,” or a capsule that guarantees to “Boost energy levels” or “Improve libido.” Then there are the bold claims: “Helps burn fat while preserving muscle!” or the ever-popular “Backed by science!” which honestly is as useful as saying a cup of coffee is ‘backed by hydrology’ because it contains water. The underlying fear of “missing out” on these benefits, or worse, the fear of not optimizing your body, nudges you to click “add to cart”. You think, Better safe than sorry, right? What if everyone else is getting these benefits and I’m not?”
Then, a few weeks in, you’re looking in the mirror. You’re still fit/active, eating decently, but that promised surge in energy? That noticeable “boost” in performance? That suddenly enhanced libido? It’s just… not quite there. It gets so, so tricky when that fear extends to the fear of getting sick. You see ads for “super-immunity” blends, enhanced multi-vitamin gummies promising to turn you into an absolute unit. You’re not built different, man. You load up, religiously consume it everyday, but there’s just nothing saving you from these monsoons, right? And you’re left wondering, “Did I just really pay 1500 bucks to eat glorified Faleros?” (This line definitely hurt, as I’d die for Faleros.)
If this feels familiar, you’re in good company. We’re living in an era where the Indian supplement market, currently valued at a staggering ₹203,601,200,000 (203.60 billion INR) in 2024 and projected to hit ₹332,139,500,000 (332.14 billion INR) by 2033. [Source: Research and Markets, Indian Sports and Fitness Goods Market Report 2024], is less about precise physiological impact and more about pure, unadulterated branding genius. This explosion is fueled by a genuine desire to be healthier, fitter, and perform better, but this desire unfortunately also makes consumers highly susceptible to hype.
So, are we, the Indian youth, simply falling for cleverly packaged placebos, driven by the fear of what we might lose if we don’t buy in? This isn’t a cynical take on every product out there, but again, just my opinion as an avid consumer of supplements.
This next part gets really interesting because I’ll unfold who is allowing Indians to get this misled and, for the average consumer, how to stop wondering if you’re actually buying benefits or just good marketing.
Let’s pull back the curtain on this wellness theatre.
What's in the Bottle? (And What's Not)
The Indian supplement market is a vibrant, often confusing, ecosystem. You’ll find everything from “Ayurvedic solutions” to “cutting-edge sports nutrition.” The common thread? Claims that sound incredibly effective, yet mysteriously lack personal context. They shout “Boosts Testosterone!” or “Supercharges Metabolism!” or “Improves Libido!” as if these are universal truths, applicable to every single body, irrespective of individual needs or baseline health. It’s like believing that one ‘detox’ juice will magically fix the gut health of someone who regularly eats homemade meals versus someone whose diet is 80% processed snacks and Red Bull. Your baseline matters hugely.
Consider the classic “Boosts Testosterone” claim. Brands often highlight ingredients like Ashwagandha, Shilajit, or Fenugreek. While traditional uses and some preliminary studies do exist, suggesting these might help correct a deficiency or imbalance, they rarely “boost” healthy levels beyond your natural range. For example, some studies on Shilajit indicate an increase in total testosterone, but these are often in men with low testosterone and conducted over 90 days at 500mg–1g/day [Source: Health.com, “Shilajit: 8 Benefits, Uses, Side Effects, and More”]. If a product contains just 100mg, it’s under-dosed for the claimed effect. If your testosterone is already normal, that shilajit might just be a very expensive placebo – a fancy car with no engine under the hood.
Similarly, “Improves Mental Clarity / Energy” often points to caffeine, L-theanine, or B vitamins. These might offer a temporary lift or address a deficiency, but they won’t magically solve chronic fatigue rooted in poor sleep or high stress. It’s like using a band-aid for a broken bone. “The actual impact of such supplements for healthy individuals is often negligible; in a study on Indian students, a majority (85% of medical students and 67% of paramedical students) reported consuming dietary supplements, with internet and social media being the main influencers [Source: Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science, “Perceptions of Dietary Supplements in Students: Do you Really Need Them?”, 2021]. This highlights how the perception of widespread use and implied benefit, often driven by online content, is a powerful motivator, regardless of proven individual physiological change or genuine deficiency.”
Then there are “Helps burn fat while preserving muscle” or “Boosts Metabolism” claims, typically loaded with green tea extract, caffeine, or CLA. While these ingredients can have a minor effect, it’s often negligible without a proper diet and training regimen. We’re talking about nudging your calorie burn by a measly 50-100 kcal a day max (Avoiding half a roti) [Source: Examine.com, generally accepted negligible effect of metabolic boosters] – utterly negligible if your diet and training aren’t dialed in. The problem is, these generalized claims sound universally effective. But as any fitness enthusiast knows, true progress is deeply personal. The market is crowded because it preys on vague anxieties and promises broad solutions, rather than delivering targeted, evidence-based interventions. It’s a marketing free-for-all, where a vague “supports vitality” is enough to grab your attention, regardless of what your body actually needs.
How Brands Play "Hide and Seek" with the Rules
Well… They actually can.
So, who’s letting these brands slap such generalized, often misleading, claims on their packaging? In India, the primary guardian of your supplement’s safety and truthfulness is the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI). They operate under the FSS (Nutraceuticals) Regulations, 2016 (updated in 2022). Now, FSSAI does require supplements to have a license, list ingredients, and provide dosage. They step in if a product is outright unsafe or makes explicit medical claims like “cures diabetes.”
But here’s the catch, and this is where brands pull off their magic trick: FSSAI largely doesn’t pre-approve or rigorously police general “structure-function claims.” Phrases like “supports testosterone levels,” “boosts energy,” “improves focus,” or “enhances vitality” are considered non-committal (i.e., not expressing or revealing commitment to a definite course of action or position; basically: vague). It’s exactly like saying “this car may help you reach your destination faster” without ever proving it actually increases speed. Because they’re not explicitly claiming to cure a disease, they’re often deemed permissible. It’s a giant crack in the system that lets brands get away with a lot, and I mean a lot.
Compare this to places like the US or EU. In the US, the FTC (Federal Trade Commission) can sue brands for false advertising if claims lack scientific evidence, and supplements must carry a mandatory disclaimer: “These statements have not been evaluated by the FDA. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.” The EU is even stricter; you can’t say “boosts metabolism” unless it’s scientifically proven at the specific dose in your product by pre-approved scientific review by EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). In India? Unless someone files a formal complaint, or the product is outright dangerous, FSSAI isn’t doing proactive efficacy testing. This means that while brands need an FSSAI license number on their product (a basic requirement), the actual truthfulness of their general health claims isn’t systematically vetted by the authority unless a problem arises [Source: Food Research Lab, FSSAI Regulations for Dietary Supplements in India]. Brands often hide behind an “Ayurveda Shield” for traditional ingredients, or use vague wording like “may help with…” which requires no proof. It’s a game of semantic dodgeball, and brands are winning because the rules are too loose, allowing a flood of products to market based on implication, not investigation. It’s like a group project where countries like the US and EU have to show their full workings and bibliography for every claim, while Indian brands just get to shout ‘Trust me, bro’.
Cut the Noise, Get Real Results
So, amidst this flood of flashy bottles and grand promises, how do you, the smart, informed consumer, make sense of it all? The solution isn’t about becoming a human encyclopedia of supplement science; it’s about adopting a few simple, actionable habits to cut through the noise. Think of it as your personal filter for marketing hype.
Here’s how to interpret the branding and find what’s best for your individual needs:
- Question the Claim, Always. When you see a claim like “Boosts energy,” ask: My energy, specifically? What’s causing my low energy? Is it lack of sleep, poor diet, or stress? If a product claims to “burn fat,” clarify: how much fat? Under what conditions? Without a specific problem you’re trying to solve, you’re just throwing money at a vague promise.
- Look for Real Evidence, Not Buzzwords. Forget “clinically tested” if there’s no citation. Go to Examine.com (an independent resource that doesn’t sell products) or PubMed (a database of scientific research). Check if the dosage in the product matches the amounts used in effective studies. For example, many studies on Vitamin D for bone health or immunity use doses higher than what’s found in some daily supplements. Did the study include people like you (age, health status)? A study on a specific demographic might not apply to your situation.
- Consult a Pro, Not a Product (or an Influencer). The easiest, most reliable way to navigate the supplement maze is to talk to someone qualified. This means a certified nutritionist, a registered dietitian, or a doctor who understands sports and performance. They can assess your individual diet, lifestyle, and health goals to recommend what (if anything) is truly beneficial for you. For instance, Vitamin D deficiency is rampant in India, with studies showing 70%-100% prevalence in the general population, and particularly high among young adults (up to 84% for those under 25) [Source: ETHealthworld, “3 out of 4 Indians Suffer from Vitamin D Deficiency,” January 2023; PMC, “Vitamin D Deficiency in India,” 2014]. In such cases, a Vitamin D supplement with the right dosage based on professional advice could be genuinely impactful. Your doctor or nutritionist is your GPS in this confusing terrain, guiding you to your actual destination rather than letting you drive aimlessly based on flashy billboards. Their advice is gold, unlike the often-empty promises on a shiny bottle.
Conclusion: Don't Hate the Player, Hate the Game
So, what’s really the takeaway from this entire deep dive? The point is, what brands are doing isn’t always legally wrong. (Don’t hate the player, hate the game, right?) It’s more a matter of ethics. As brands evolve, seemingly embracing a new trend of “increased transparency”, there arises a crucial need to question what being transparent really means. Maybe this increased awareness can force a whole new wave of genuine and factual packaging begrudgingly for brands at the expense of profit. For the consumer, it means you can take a few simple steps to cut through the noise, ensure you’re getting tangible benefits, and save a lot of money in the process. (You can transfer this money to my account instead)
Thanks for Reading!
If this article sparked a thought or made you see supplement branding a little differently — that’s a win in my playbook.
Feel free to share, contact me, or just come back for the next one.